|
Quick delivery of the product to the merchant will encourage customers to buy again. Just a suggestion, i think delivery plays a major part when buying online.
but this is not up to par with his standard level of brilliance. Given the prestige of the authors involved, I think this book is very disappointing. Mostly a rambling collection of professorial articles that do not give the reader any concrete advice or business tools to work with.We all love Peter D.
(Perrin Stryker) Comment: Even veteran managers are likely to be very unsystematic when dealing with problems and decisions, and their hit-or-miss methods often produce bad decisions based on erroneous conclusions. Keeney, and Howard Raiffa) Comment: Bad decisions can often be traced back to the way the decisions were made - the alternatives that were not clearly defined, the right information was not collected, and the costs and benefits were not accurately weighed.When to "trust your gut". It remains for each reader to examine the list to identify which subjects are of greatest interest to her or him. My own opinion is that all of the articles are first-rate. (Alden M. Adelphia Communications, Arthur Andersen, Enron, Kmart, and Tyco) suggests the implications and consequences when decision-makers ignore one or more of these steps. (Peter Drucker) Comment: Effective executives do not make a great many decisions. However, but the number of well-publicized bad decisions that have been made in recent years (e.g.
Much of the contextual material in this volume is out-of-date, given the fact that the eight articles originally appeared in the Harvard Business Review years ago (1965-2001). Hammond, Ralph L. They concentrate on what is most important.What is a rational method for making trade-offs. (Chris Argyris)Comment: One of the most common observations in company studies is that executives lack awareness of their own behavioral patterns as well as the negative impact of their behavior on others.How to analyze the nature and extent of the given problem. One of this volume's greatest benefits is derived from the fact that a variety of perspectives are provided by a number of different authorities on the same general subject. In this instance, "advances [to date] in strategy" Readers will especially appreciate the provision of an executive summary that precedes each article. However, I think the core concepts remain sound and provide a valuable frame-of-reference for understanding the advances in decision making that have occurred during the last five years. For example, Peter Drucker suggests a sequence of six steps: classify the problem, define it, identify possible answers, determine which is "right" rather than acceptable, build into the decision the action(s) necessary to implement it, and then test the decision's validity and effectiveness.
Hammond, Ralph L. Keeney, and Howard Raiffa)Comment: Making wise trade-offs is one of the most important and difficult challenges in decision making. (John S. (Amitai Etzioni)Comment: Only fools make rigid decisions and decisions with no sense of overarching purpose, whereas the most able executives practice more humble decision making that offers the benefits of flexibility, caution, and the capacity to proceed with partial knowledge.What are the most common interpersonal barriers to decision making and how to overcome them. Also of interest is the "About the Contributors" section that includes suggestions of other sources to consult.
(John S. Hayshi)Comment: Our emotions and feelings might not only be important in our intuitive ability to make good decisions but may actually be essential because they can help us to filter various options quickly.Those who share my high regard for this volume are urged to check out the recently published Harvard Business Review on Making Smarter Decisions as well as other titles in the Harvard Business Review Paperback Series such as those on Becoming a High-Performance Manager, Change, Corporate Strategy, Decision Making, Effective Communication, the Innovative Enterprise, Leadership, Leadership at the Top, and Measuring Corporate Performance. What are the hidden traps in decision making. Yes, these are obvious steps. Needless to say, the more alternatives you are considering and the more objectives you're pursuing, the more trade-offs you'll need to make.Why is humility essential to effective decision-making.
Here are questions that suggest key issues to which the authors of these articles respond: How to make and then measure an "effective" decision. No brief commentary such as this can do full justice to the rigor and substance of the eight articles. They facilitate, indeed expedite frequent review of key points which - presumably - careful readers either underline or highlight.
But, now, after digesting these powerful articles, I can make my way through uncertain times; clothed in conviction and sitting on a soft pillow of apathy. Many times I would stumble blindly through the veil of uncertainty, only to arrive on the otherside; lost, confused, naked, and too sore to sit down. Don't let the title mislead you, this book won't make decisions for you. I will however, give you the ability to make use of your most powerful business tool: a convincing guess.
When it occurs, the decision goes wrong because a decision maker has already misstated the problem.6.The Estimating and Forecasting Traps have three minor traps,a.The overconfidence trap makes people overestimate the accuracy of the forecasts.b.The prudence trap causes people to be overcautious when people make decision under uncertain or risky situation.c.The recall ability trap leads people to give incorrect weigh to recent, dramatic events.The book rightly emphasizes the facts that a good decision not only relies on clearly defining the alternatives, collecting the correct information, and so on during the decision-making process, but also relate to the benefits and costs which are weighed accurately. However, in the real-reality (as opposed to virtual reality, as a model), many decisions can be made under the highest-level conceptual understanding. In order to put the suck cost away, a decision maker can listen other people's viewpoints and those people must to be those who did not experience the earlier decisions.4.The confirming-evidence trap makes people find out the information to support an existing predilection, rather than to conflict it. To illustrate, the coupling in the pipe carrying steam or hot liquids, rather than the problem of production processing. Except the factors of individuals, the economic circumstances will influence the decision and its action too. They require a rule, a policy, or a principle.
The truly unique events are rare and have to be treated individually. It is true that we will not know the decision is the most efficient or not if we put the decision into practice. The second group is a unique problem for the individual institution. Converting the decision into action is the most time-consuming steps in the decision-making process. Furthermore, the background, the experience of a decision maker will be one of the factors which affect the decision making.
As the right and wrong compromise, Peter F. The feedback of decision action is the important information for a decision maker in order to realize the result of the decision model also for the future model building. On the other hand, people will try to discount the opposing information. The right compromise is like an old saying, "Half a loaf is better than no bread." In the contrast, the wrong compromise is like, "half a baby is worse than no baby at all." From this interesting description, it is easy to realize that deciding the right decision is more important than choosing the acceptable one.5.Building into the decision the action to carry it out. 2-19)1.Classifying the problem in order to tell if it should be solved based on either principles or pragmatic concept.
However, it is the most important part of the whole decision process because sometimes the definition of the problem seems plausible but incomplete. Once the right principle has been developed, all manifestations of the same generic situation can be handled pragmatically by adjusting the rules to each specific case.2.Defining the problem. Drucker suggested all of the decision makers check this process, defining the problem, again and again against all the observable facts and discard a definition the moment it fails to encompass any of them.3.Specifying the answer to the problem to see if the decision is on the boundary conditions or not. After classifying the problem is generic or unique, it is quite easy to define what the problem is about that we are dealing with. There are several questions that have to be answered before committing the decision, "Who has to know this decision.", "What action has to be taken.", "Who is to take it.", "What does the action have to be so that the people who have to do it can do it." From those questions, it is obviously that an appropriate person who carries out the decision must have enough capabilities of adjusting his/her behavior, habits or attitudes once a decision becomes effective.6.Testing the validity and effectiveness of the decision against the actual course of events. Being an effective manager requires being a good-decision maker too, having ability of using factual and quantitative information to analyze what is the most efficient decision to reach a well-defined objective. In the article, "The Hidden Traps in Decision Making, (pp. Therefore, before picking up the optimal solution, a decision maker has to deeply think about a question, "what are the objectives the decision has to reach." Clearly thinking about the boundary conditions will help decision makers identify all of the possible decisions which can satisfy the needs.4.Deciding what is right, rather than what is acceptable, in order to meet the boundary conditions.
143-67)" John Hammond, Ralph Keeney, and Howard Raiffa list nine psychological traps that may affect a way that a decision maker makes business decision.1.The anchoring trap makes people give inappropriate weigh to the first information we receive. Unlike truly unique events, the other two groups require a generic solution. Making good decision by applied management science approach is the benefits that managers expect to learn combining with past experience to decide on what should be done. The way the human brain works can destroy the choice we make.
At this stage, the product control or engineering group will look at what is going on in a production line. This kind of problems frequently happens. However, information should be built on the direct exposure to reality, rather on decision makers themselves. In business, for example, although it seems the decision that a manager predict how much product need to be produced by taking the former sales reports as a reference is reasonable, the old sales numbers become anchors because it may let a manager put too much attention on past event but not give enough weigh to other factors. In addition, a better understanding of decision making can be broken down into six sequential steps according to Drucker (pp.
In order to make decisions rationally and objectively, a decision maker always have to keep in mind that the decision will be acted under the status quo and never consider status quo as the only alternative.3.The sunk-cost trap is another serious biases. Drucker had an interesting description. Although a good decision may be made under the decision-making process, sometimes the decision will still fail because of the mind of decision makers. In order to avoid the confirming-evidence trap, a decision maker can set up a clincher, let other people argue it, and listen people's advice.5.The framing trap happens at the beginning of the decision process. Under this situation, it can lead to a poor forecast.2.The status-quo trap means people may have biases on the situation we feel comfortable with so that we will not choose other alternatives even they are better.
However, if a decision maker does not know what will meet the boundary conditions, the manager cannot distinguish the difference between the right and wrong compromise. The first group is the generic problems; for example, in a manufacturing organization, it may happen the situation like total amount of products decreasing. A decision that does not satisfy the boundary condition is worse than the wrong definition of the problem. People always believe that successfully past decision even though it does not work anymore at the present.
The problem can be categorized in three groups. Above all, six steps of decision process are the stepping stones for decision making. It means before paying attention on making decision acceptable by the compromise, adaptations, and concessions, we have to let the solution fully satisfy the specifications. The third group is a truly unique problem which happens out of exception.
In order to avoid this kind of carelessness, Peter F.
|
